Pre-Algebra · Grades 6
Properties of Operations and Equivalent Expressions
Quick answer
The properties of operations are the rules that say which rearrangements are safe. Commutative lets you swap the order, associative lets you regroup, and distributive lets you multiply across a bracket. Two expressions are equivalent when they give the same value for every input, and testing one value can disprove equivalence but never prove it.
What you'll learn
- Name and apply the commutative, associative and distributive properties
- Generate an equivalent expression using the properties
- Decide whether two expressions are equivalent
The rules that say what is allowed
Rearranging an expression is only safe if a property permits it. There are four worth naming.
| Property | Addition | Multiplication |
|---|---|---|
| commutative | ||
| associative | ||
| identity | ||
| distributive | — |
Commutative: order does not matter
Both give the same answer, so terms can be written in any order.
It applies to addition and multiplication only. Subtraction and division are not commutative:
There is a way around that, and it matters later. Rewrite the subtraction as adding the opposite. It is now an addition, so the order can be swapped:
That rewrite is what lets terms move freely when collecting like terms.
Associative: grouping does not matter
Both give . The brackets move; the order stays.
This is what lets you add a long list in any order you like. Adding is quicker as . The property is what makes that regrouping a rule rather than a lucky shortcut.
Distributive: multiplying across a bracket
This is the only property linking multiplication with addition. It gets a lesson of its own, because so much rests on it.
Equivalent expressions
Two expressions are equivalent when they give the same value for every input.
They agree everywhere. The distributive property explains why: one is the other rearranged by a rule that keeps the value the same.
Why testing values cannot prove equivalence
This is the point worth being careful about.
Take and . At :
They match. They are not equivalent, and shows it:
One agreement was a coincidence. Equivalence needs agreement at every value. No amount of testing covers every value, so testing can never prove it.
What testing does do is disprove equivalence, and one case is enough. That makes it a fast error-check. After simplifying, put a value into the original and into your answer. If they differ, something went wrong. Pick something other than or , since those hide many mistakes.
To prove equivalence, turn one expression into the other using the properties. That covers every input at once. Each step keeps the value the same, by definition.
Worked examples
Common mistakes
Practice problems
-
Which property says ?
Answer
Commutative property of multiplication
Full solution
The order of the factors has swapped.
-
Which property says ?
Answer
Associative property of addition
Full solution
Only the brackets moved.
-
Is equal to ?
Answer
No
Full solution
against . Division is not commutative.
-
Write an expression equivalent to .
Answer
Full solution
Distribute the across both terms.
-
Is equivalent to ?
Answer
Yes
Full solution
The identity property of addition: adding zero changes nothing.
-
Are and equivalent?
Answer
Yes
Full solution
Addition is commutative, so the order does not matter.
-
Are and equivalent?
Hint
Try a value other than .
Answer
No
Full solution
At : and . They differ, so they are not equivalent.
They happen to agree at , which is exactly why one test value is never enough.
-
Simplify using the properties.
Answer
Full solution
Reorder with the commutative property and regroup with the associative one: .
-
Is equivalent to ?
Answer
No
Full solution
At they give and . Subtraction does not commute.
They agree only at , where both are zero.
-
Nina tests and at , finds both give , and concludes they are equivalent. Assess her reasoning.
Hint
What does equivalence require?
Answer
One matching value proves nothing. They are not equivalent.
Full solution
Equivalence means agreeing at every value, so a single test can only ever disprove it.
At : while . They differ, so the expressions are not equivalent.
is the one value where they happen to coincide, and it is a particularly unlucky choice — as are and , which hide errors for the same reason.
Proving equivalence needs the properties instead: transform one expression into the other, and every step covers all values at once.
Frequently asked questions
What is the commutative property?
Order does not matter for addition and multiplication: a + b = b + a and ab = ba. It does not hold for subtraction or division.
What is the associative property?
Grouping does not matter for addition and multiplication: (a + b) + c = a + (b + c). Only the brackets move, not the order.
What makes two expressions equivalent?
They give the same value for every possible input. 2(x + 3) and 2x + 6 are equivalent because no value of x separates them.
Can I prove equivalence by testing one value?
No. One matching value could be a coincidence. One value that differs does disprove equivalence, which is why testing is useful for finding errors.
Why do subtraction and division not commute?
Because 7 - 3 is 4 while 3 - 7 is -4. Swapping the order changes which number is being taken from which.
Standards alignment
This lesson covers the following Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
- CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.EE.A.3Expressions and EquationsApply the properties of operations to generate equivalent expressions.
- CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.6.EE.A.4Expressions and EquationsIdentify when two expressions are equivalent (i.e., when the two expressions name the same number regardless of which value is substituted into them).