Precalculus · Grades 11, 12

Proof by Mathematical Induction

Quick answer

Mathematical induction proves a statement about every positive integer in two steps. The base case checks the statement for n = 1. The inductive step assumes it for one unnamed value k and derives it for k + 1. Together they reach every integer, the way one falling domino topples the whole line. The method proves sum formulas, divisibility claims and inequalities, and both steps are needed: without a base case the step can carry a false statement forever.

What you'll learn

  • State the base case and the inductive step of a proof
  • Prove a sum formula by induction
  • Prove a divisibility claim or an inequality by induction
  • Explain why both steps are needed

A line of dominoes

Some statements are about every positive integer at once:

1+2+3+⋯+n=n(n+1)21 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n + 1)}{2}

There are infinitely many cases, so checking them one at a time never finishes. Mathematical induction proves them all with two steps, the way a line of dominoes falls:

  1. Base case. Knock over the first domino: prove the statement for n=1n = 1.
  2. Inductive step. Show each domino topples the next: assume the statement for some value kk, then prove it for k+1k + 1.

The assumption in step 2 is the inductive hypothesis. It is assumed for one unnamed kk, not for every nn, which is what keeps the argument honest.

The sums 1 + 2 + ⋯ + n against the formula The curve y = x(x + 1)/2 rising from the origin, with six points on it at x = 1 through 6, at heights 1, 3, 6, 10, 15 and 21: the running totals of 1 + 2 + ⋯ + n. 1234567510152025nS
  • y = n(n + 1)/2
The sums 1 + 2 + ⋯ + n against the formula

Why two steps are enough

Suppose the statement failed somewhere. Then among the values where it fails there is a smallest one, call it mm. The base case rules out m=1m = 1, so m−1m - 1 is a positive integer where the statement holds. But the inductive step carries truth from m−1m - 1 to mm, so the statement holds at mm after all. A counterexample would have to be the first one, and the base case and the step together leave no room for a first one, so there is no counterexample.

The same idea read forward: to reach n=57n = 57, start at the base case and use the step 5656 times.

Both steps carry weight

Drop the base case and the reasoning collapses. Take the false claim n=n+1n = n + 1. Assuming k=k+1k = k + 1 and adding 11 to both sides gives k+1=k+2k + 1 = k + 2, so the inductive step is fine. No base case is available, because 1=21 = 2 is false, and nothing is proved.

Skipping the step is no better. The expression n2+n+41n^2 + n + 41 is prime for every nn from 00 to 3939, which is forty successful checks, and at n=40n = 40 it equals 1681=4121681 = 41^2.

Worked examples

Common mistakes

Practice problems

  1. Prove 2+4+6+⋯+2n=n(n+1)2 + 4 + 6 + \cdots + 2n = n(n + 1).

    Answer

    Base: 2=1(2)2 = 1(2). Step: k(k+1)+2(k+1)=(k+1)(k+2)k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 2).

    Full solution

    At n=1n = 1 both sides are 22. Assuming the sum of the first kk even numbers is k(k+1)k(k + 1), adding the next one, 2(k+1)2(k+1), gives (k+1)(k+2)(k + 1)(k + 2), which is the formula at k+1k + 1.

  2. Prove 1+4+7+⋯+(3n−2)=n(3n−1)21 + 4 + 7 + \cdots + (3n - 2) = \tfrac{n(3n - 1)}{2}.

    Answer

    Base: 1=1(2)21 = \tfrac{1(2)}{2}. Step: k(3k−1)2+(3k+1)=(k+1)(3k+2)2\tfrac{k(3k - 1)}{2} + (3k + 1) = \tfrac{(k + 1)(3k + 2)}{2}.

    Full solution

    The next term after 3k−23k - 2 is 3(k+1)−2=3k+13(k + 1) - 2 = 3k + 1. Adding it: 3k2−k+6k+22=3k2+5k+22=(k+1)(3k+2)2\tfrac{3k^2 - k + 6k + 2}{2} = \tfrac{3k^2 + 5k + 2}{2} = \tfrac{(k + 1)(3k + 2)}{2}, the formula at k+1k + 1.

  3. Prove 12+22+⋯+n2=n(n+1)(2n+1)61^2 + 2^2 + \cdots + n^2 = \tfrac{n(n + 1)(2n + 1)}{6}.

    Answer

    Base: 1=1(2)(3)61 = \tfrac{1(2)(3)}{6}. Step: add (k+1)2(k + 1)^2 and factor out k+16\tfrac{k + 1}{6}.

    Full solution

    k(k+1)(2k+1)6+(k+1)2=(k+1)[k(2k+1)+6(k+1)]6=(k+1)(2k2+7k+6)6=(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)6\tfrac{k(k + 1)(2k + 1)}{6} + (k + 1)^2 = \tfrac{(k + 1)\left[k(2k + 1) + 6(k + 1)\right]}{6} = \tfrac{(k + 1)\left(2k^2 + 7k + 6\right)}{6} = \tfrac{(k + 1)(k + 2)(2k + 3)}{6}, which is the formula at k+1k + 1.

  4. Prove 13+23+⋯+n3=[n(n+1)2]21^3 + 2^3 + \cdots + n^3 = \left[\tfrac{n(n + 1)}{2}\right]^2.

    Answer

    Base: 1=121 = 1^2. Step: k2(k+1)24+(k+1)3=(k+1)2(k+2)24\tfrac{k^2(k + 1)^2}{4} + (k + 1)^3 = \tfrac{(k + 1)^2(k + 2)^2}{4}.

    Full solution

    Factor (k+1)24\tfrac{(k + 1)^2}{4} out of the left side: (k+1)2(k2+4k+4)4=(k+1)2(k+2)24\tfrac{(k + 1)^2\left(k^2 + 4k + 4\right)}{4} = \tfrac{(k + 1)^2(k + 2)^2}{4}, the formula at k+1k + 1.

  5. Prove that 5n−15^n - 1 is divisible by 44 for every n≥1n \ge 1.

    Answer

    Base: 5−1=45 - 1 = 4. Step: 5 k+1−1=5(5k−1)+45^{\,k+1} - 1 = 5\left(5^k - 1\right) + 4.

    Full solution

    Assume 5k−1=4m5^k - 1 = 4m. Then 5 k+1−1=5⋅5k−1=5(5k−1)+4=20m+4=4(5m+1)5^{\,k+1} - 1 = 5 \cdot 5^k - 1 = 5\left(5^k - 1\right) + 4 = 20m + 4 = 4(5m + 1).

  6. Prove that n3−nn^3 - n is divisible by 66 for every n≥1n \ge 1.

    Hint

    Expand (k+1)3−(k+1)(k + 1)^3 - (k + 1) and look for k3−kk^3 - k.

    Answer

    Step: (k+1)3−(k+1)=(k3−k)+3k(k+1)(k + 1)^3 - (k + 1) = \left(k^3 - k\right) + 3k(k + 1), and k(k+1)k(k + 1) is even.

    Full solution

    Base: 1−1=01 - 1 = 0, a multiple of 66. For the step, expanding gives k3+3k2+2k=(k3−k)+3k2+3kk^3 + 3k^2 + 2k = \left(k^3 - k\right) + 3k^2 + 3k. The first part is a multiple of 66 by assumption, and 3k(k+1)3k(k + 1) is a multiple of 66 because one of kk and k+1k + 1 is even.

  7. Prove 11⋅2+12⋅3+⋯+1n(n+1)=nn+1\displaystyle\frac{1}{1 \cdot 2} + \frac{1}{2 \cdot 3} + \cdots + \frac{1}{n(n + 1)} = \frac{n}{n + 1}.

    Answer

    Base: 12=12\tfrac{1}{2} = \tfrac{1}{2}. Step: kk+1+1(k+1)(k+2)=k+1k+2\tfrac{k}{k + 1} + \tfrac{1}{(k + 1)(k + 2)} = \tfrac{k + 1}{k + 2}.

    Full solution

    Over the denominator (k+1)(k+2)(k + 1)(k + 2) the left side is k(k+2)+1(k+1)(k+2)=k2+2k+1(k+1)(k+2)=(k+1)2(k+1)(k+2)=k+1k+2\tfrac{k(k + 2) + 1}{(k + 1)(k + 2)} = \tfrac{k^2 + 2k + 1}{(k + 1)(k + 2)} = \tfrac{(k + 1)^2}{(k + 1)(k + 2)} = \tfrac{k + 1}{k + 2}.

  8. Prove 2n≥n+12^n \ge n + 1 for every n≥1n \ge 1.

    Answer

    Base: 2≥22 \ge 2. Step: 2 k+1=2⋅2k≥2(k+1)≥k+22^{\,k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k \ge 2(k + 1) \ge k + 2.

    Full solution

    Doubling the assumption gives 2 k+1≥2k+22^{\,k+1} \ge 2k + 2, and 2k+2≥k+22k + 2 \ge k + 2 because k≥1k \ge 1.

  9. A proof shows that if a statement holds for kk then it holds for k+1k + 1, and stops there. What is missing, and why does it matter?

    Answer

    The base case. Without it the statement need never be true: n=n+1n = n + 1 passes the step.

    Full solution

    Assuming k=k+1k = k + 1 and adding 11 gives k+1=k+2k + 1 = k + 2, a valid step for a false claim. The step only passes truth along, so some case has to be true to begin with.

  10. In the step of a proof, a student writes “assume the statement holds for every nn, and show it holds for n+1n + 1.” What went wrong?

    Hint

    What is left to prove once you assume it for every nn?

    Answer

    Assuming it for every nn assumes the conclusion. The hypothesis covers one value, kk.

    Full solution

    Induction proves a statement for every positive integer, so assuming that at the start leaves nothing to prove. The step is a conditional: if the statement holds at one value kk, then it holds at k+1k + 1. That conditional, plus the base case, gives every case.

Frequently asked questions

What are the two steps of a proof by induction?

The base case, which checks the statement for the first value, usually n = 1. Then the inductive step, which shows that if the statement holds for k, it holds for k + 1.

What is the inductive hypothesis?

The assumption that the statement holds for one unnamed value k. It is assumed for a single k, not for every n.

Why is the base case necessary?

The step only passes truth along; something has to be true to start with. The false claim n = n + 1 survives the step but has no base case.

Can the base case be a number other than 1?

Yes. To prove a statement for every n ≥ 4, start the base case at 4. The proof then covers 4 and everything above it.

Isn't checking many cases enough?

No. n² + n + 41 is prime for every n from 0 to 39 and composite at n = 40, where it equals 41².

Standards alignment

This lesson covers the following Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.

  • CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.HSA.SSE.B.4Seeing Structure in ExpressionsDerive the formula for the sum of a finite geometric series (when the common ratio is not 1), and use the formula to solve problems.